Elitmus
Exam
Logical Reasoning
Decision Making and Problem Solving
There is a cricket match played between India vs Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka Scored 260 Runs.
From India, Virat Kohli scores maximum runs.
Who has scored the 2nd highest runs from India?
1) Total runs difference between Rahane and Kohli is scored by Ashwin
2) Only Kohli,Rahane and Ashwin has batted from team India.
Read Solution (Total 22)
-
- option D........if the question cannot be explain by using both the statements together.
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(34) No(2)
- gandu h Vikash Gupta, aata jata hai ni aa gaya h solution dene......
sale ulta b to ho sakta h dharti k bojh - 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(31) No(1)
- if we will take Rahane =90 Kohli =130 is scored by Ashwin =40
so i think option c is currect .
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(10) No(62)
- @ mohit gupta ... as u said ''The difference of any two things will always lesser than that two things.'' how could be this alwas possible ....
90-1=89 etc. you need to think over it
and i think answer must be option D. we can not assume the score of rahane and ashwin. - 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(6) No(0)
- Can any1 tell that what is the basis of marking the solution as BEST SOLUTION ? irrespective of number of yes < number of No.
- 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(5) No(0)
- rahane will score second highest runs from india...diffrence is from kohli to rahane..and so ans will have to be lesser than those two which is ashwin's score.hence i derived ...RAHANE.
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(4) No(16)
- additonal inforamation required......
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(3) No(1)
- Guys,
My elitmus score has come.
I have written D option for this question but I got negative marking for this that means option D is wrong.
How.?
Then what is the correct answer? - 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(3) No(1)
- Both staements needs to get the answer, and data is sufficent.
The difference of any two things will always lesser than that two things.
so, it is cleared that Rahane would be 2nd highest scorer from India. - 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(3) No(12)
- additional info required...
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
- both are insufficient.
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(1)
- @ Vikas Gupta (261 or more runs need to Win but in qsn it is not menion than who wins?? Then how anyone can solve this Qsn)
Win Case possible :
Kohli : Rahane : Ashwin
1) 133 - 132 1 (Assume match is draw n virat(127*) is in strike n hit '6' )
2) 133 - 1 132( '' '' '' )
Lose case
1) 20 - 5 15(over ends after scoring 40 runs)
2) 20 - 15 5("" " " )
So, how anyone can conclude Yaar!!!
And in solution Solved by vikash gupta is mention with ans "C"....
Correct me if I m wrong - 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
- Only deduction is Kohli scored 130 runs. Other than that, extra information is required
- 9 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(2)
- Kohli rahane Ashwin
max case
130 90 40
130 40 90
130 120 10
130 10 120
Min case
2 1 1 - 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- Ram Kumar ...I think whose and got the max. no.of Response, it doesn't matter it is Yes or No, right or wrong ....
- 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- option D ..BOTH statement r insufficient to answer the question...
k+r+a=260
k-r=a;
or
k-a=r;
nothing can be drawn using both the statments,so D IS THE answer - 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- Option(D) if it is data sufficiency Qusentions, otherwise can't be solved because data is missing in this question.
- 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- both will be needed
- 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
- SSC tell me approach
- 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- Correct answer is: D (cannot be determined)
- 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- Correct answer is: D
You cannot get exact one answer even by combining both 2 statements. - 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
- option D because for telling virat kohli score u need india's runs. we dont know how much india score becuase if u assuming winning case still its so much possiblity if its tie its one possiblity nd if lose th
then mre than 200 possiblity - 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
Elitmus Other Question