There are four friends Akash, Manoj, Nitesh and Piyush.They are standing in increasing order of their heights facing towards North.At what position is Manoj standing?
Statements:
I. Akash is taller than Piyush and Piyush is taller than Manoj. Manoj is not the shortest.
II. Nitesh is smaller than Manoj and Piyush.Nitesh is the shortest and Piyush is the tallest.
a) I alone is sufficient while II alone is not sufficient
b) II alone is sufficient while I alone is not sufficient
c) Either I or II is sufficient
d) Neither I nor II is sufficient
e) Both I and II together are sufficient

• option a is the answer
  as from statement 1 we can conclude that A>P>M>N so we got position of M
  but in second position of M&A is not defined properly
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(36) No(2)
• i guess D
  probably correct
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(4) No(18)
• option a is the correct ans
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(4) No(2)
• A is correct
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(3) No(0)
• correct answer is a
  from that we can find out the manoj standing
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(3) No(0)
• Ans is D
  Because in
  Statement I. N is not defined (If it is Tallest or Shortest)
  Statement II. (A is not defined) As Piyush is the tallest and Nitesh is the Shortest and position of Manoj and Akash is not define. So we can't say at what position they come..
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(2) No(9)
• option-e
  we need both statement to identify the manoj's position
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(2) No(7)
• option e is correct
  we want both of the statements
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(1)
• a) in statement 1 we can find A>P>M>N
  in statement 2 no details about akash. so we cant tell position of manoj
  
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(1)
• option a is correct becoz 2nd case not justify 1st case
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
• Option a is correct
  Nitesh
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
• Option (a)
  because from ques we know m
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
• e is the correct option because to know the position of manoj we need to know the heights of the other three in first statement nitesh height is not given and in second akash is not given but when considering both the statements we get to know the position of manoj and hence when both together we get the required answer
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(1)
• from statement A we get sequence that is
  A>P>M>N
  so option a is correct
  
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
• option (d) is correct...because there is contradiction in question . In 1st statement aakash is taller than piyush but in 2nd statement piyush is tallest
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
• answer is c
• 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(0)
• Option a is correct
  1.Akash
  2.piyush
  3.manoj
  4.nithesh
• 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(1) No(3)
• Ans is E..
  N-M-?-?
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
• Option A
  according to given condition in 1st statment it is clear that manoj is at 3rd no
  but if we see 2nd statment then it is not sufficient alone.
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
• option a is crct
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• option a, as we can conclude that a>p>m>n.
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• e,because 1st statement and 2nd statement describe the position of four friend.this sequence are A,P,M,N.
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• option e is the answer
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
• Option e is the correct answer.
  Beause from 1st statement we can't arrange the whole series i.e.A>P>M>N.
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
• c> either i and ii is sufficient bcoz i statements not fullfill statements condition
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
• option a correct
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(1)
• A.) 1 alone is sufficient
• 8 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• option a is correct.
• 7 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• Either 1 or 2
• 6 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• 2 is sufficient
• 6 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)
• "a' is a answer
• 4 years agoHelpfull: Yes(0) No(0)