Latest Elitmus Aptitude Question SOLUTION: do anyone got result of elitmus held on 11 oct 2015? plz rply soon.. i didnt get d result upto now

Follow Quotesrain

Elitmus Question Papers:

Elitmus Select Another Category Category Select Another Topic

Exam

Elitmus Question Topics

Category (451)

General Ability (14)

General Knowledge(13)

HR Interview (38)

Interview(17)

Logical Reasoning (410)

Numerical Ability (1568)

Programming (9)

Verbal Ability (161)

Advertisements

Previous Question: A game of strategy, as currently conceived in game theory, is a situation in which two or more “players” make choices among available alternatives (moves). The totality of choices determines the outcomes of the game, and it is assumed that the rank order of preferences for the outcomes is different for different players. Thus the “interests” of the players are generally in conflict. Whether these interests are diametrically opposed or only partially opposed depends on the type of game. Psychologically, most interesting situations arise when the interests of the players are partly coincident and partly opposed, because then one can postulate not only a conflict among the players but also inner conflicts within the players. Each is torn between a tendency to cooperate, so as to promote the common interests, and a tendency to complete, so as to enhance his own individual interests. Internal conflicts are always psychologically interesting. What we vaguely call “interesting” psychology is in very great measure the psychology of inner conflict. Inner conflict is also held to be an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. The classical tragedy, as well as the serious novel, reveals the inner conflict of central figures. The superficial adventure story, on the other hand, depicts only external conflict; that is, the threats of the person with whom the leader (or viewer) identifies stem in these stories exclusively from external obstacles and from the adversaries who create them. On the most primitive level this sort of external conflict is psychologically empty. In the fisticuffs between the protagonists of good and evil, no psychological problems are involved or, at any rate, none are depicted in juvenile represents of conflict. The detective story, the “adult” analogue of a juvenile adventure tale, has at times been described as a glorification of intellectualized conflict. However, a great deal of the interest in the plots of these stories is sustained by withholding the unraveling of a solution to a problem. The effort of solving the problem is in itself not a conflict if the adversary (the unknown criminal) remains passive, like Nature, whose secrets the scientist supposedly unravels by deduction. If the adversary actively puts obstacles in the detective’s path toward the solution, there is genuine conflict. But the conflict is psychologically interesting only to the extent that it contains irrational components such as tactical error on the criminal’s part or the detective’s insight into some psychological quick of the criminal or something of this sort. Conflict conducted in a perfectly rational manner is psychologically no more interesting than a standard Western. For example, Tic‐tac‐toe, played perfectly by both players, is completely devoid of psychological interest. Chess may be psychologically interesting but only to the extent that it is played not quite rationally. Played completely rationally, chess would not be different from Tic‐tac‐toe. In short, a pure conflict of interest (what is called a zero‐sum game) although it offers a wealth of interesting conceptual problems, is not interesting psychologically, except to the extent that its conduct departs from rational norms. 1)According to the passage, internal conflicts are psychologically more interesting than external conflicts because A)internal conflicts, rather than external conflicts, form an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. B)only juveniles or very few “adults” actually experience external conflict, while internal conflict is more widely prevalent in society. C)in situations of internal conflict, individuals experience a dilemma in resolving their own preferences for different outcomes. D)there are no threats to the reader (or viewer) in case of external conflicts 2) Which, according to the author, would qualify as interesting psychology? A) A statistician’s dilemma over choosing the best method to solve an optimization problem. B) A chess player’s predicament over adopting a defensive strategy against an aggressive opponent C) A mountaineer’s choice of the best path to Mt. Everest from the base camp. D) A finance manger’s quandary over the best way of raising money from the market. 3)According to the passage, which of the following options about the application of a game theory to a conflictof‐ interest situation is true? A) Assuming that the rank order of preferences for options is different for different players. B) Accepting that the interests of different players are often in conflict. C) Not assuming that the interests are in complete disagreement. D) All of the above Next Question: I am going to take test on nov 8 2015. I am 2015 batch Passout. Present I don't have my 10th,B.Tech originals are not with me.It is in custody of my college adminstration. only i have semester wise transcripts with me .So am I write exam or not?

(#M40154377) ELITMUS Category question Keep an EYE

do anyone got result of elitmus held on 11 oct 2015? plz rply soon.. i didnt get d result upto now: Asked In Elitmus Bushra (8 years ago); Unsolved Read Solution (9); Is this Puzzle helpful? (0) (0) Submit Your Solution

Advertisements

Read Solution (9) :

Please Login to Read Solution.

Previous Question: A game of strategy, as currently conceived in game theory, is a situation in which two or more “players” make choices among available alternatives (moves). The totality of choices determines the outcomes of the game, and it is assumed that the rank order of preferences for the outcomes is different for different players. Thus the “interests” of the players are generally in conflict. Whether these interests are diametrically opposed or only partially opposed depends on the type of game. Psychologically, most interesting situations arise when the interests of the players are partly coincident and partly opposed, because then one can postulate not only a conflict among the players but also inner conflicts within the players. Each is torn between a tendency to cooperate, so as to promote the common interests, and a tendency to complete, so as to enhance his own individual interests. Internal conflicts are always psychologically interesting. What we vaguely call “interesting” psychology is in very great measure the psychology of inner conflict. Inner conflict is also held to be an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. The classical tragedy, as well as the serious novel, reveals the inner conflict of central figures. The superficial adventure story, on the other hand, depicts only external conflict; that is, the threats of the person with whom the leader (or viewer) identifies stem in these stories exclusively from external obstacles and from the adversaries who create them. On the most primitive level this sort of external conflict is psychologically empty. In the fisticuffs between the protagonists of good and evil, no psychological problems are involved or, at any rate, none are depicted in juvenile represents of conflict. The detective story, the “adult” analogue of a juvenile adventure tale, has at times been described as a glorification of intellectualized conflict. However, a great deal of the interest in the plots of these stories is sustained by withholding the unraveling of a solution to a problem. The effort of solving the problem is in itself not a conflict if the adversary (the unknown criminal) remains passive, like Nature, whose secrets the scientist supposedly unravels by deduction. If the adversary actively puts obstacles in the detective’s path toward the solution, there is genuine conflict. But the conflict is psychologically interesting only to the extent that it contains irrational components such as tactical error on the criminal’s part or the detective’s insight into some psychological quick of the criminal or something of this sort. Conflict conducted in a perfectly rational manner is psychologically no more interesting than a standard Western. For example, Tic‐tac‐toe, played perfectly by both players, is completely devoid of psychological interest. Chess may be psychologically interesting but only to the extent that it is played not quite rationally. Played completely rationally, chess would not be different from Tic‐tac‐toe. In short, a pure conflict of interest (what is called a zero‐sum game) although it offers a wealth of interesting conceptual problems, is not interesting psychologically, except to the extent that its conduct departs from rational norms. 1)According to the passage, internal conflicts are psychologically more interesting than external conflicts because A)internal conflicts, rather than external conflicts, form an important component of serious literature as distinguished from less serious genres. B)only juveniles or very few “adults” actually experience external conflict, while internal conflict is more widely prevalent in society. C)in situations of internal conflict, individuals experience a dilemma in resolving their own preferences for different outcomes. D)there are no threats to the reader (or viewer) in case of external conflicts 2) Which, according to the author, would qualify as interesting psychology? A) A statistician’s dilemma over choosing the best method to solve an optimization problem. B) A chess player’s predicament over adopting a defensive strategy against an aggressive opponent C) A mountaineer’s choice of the best path to Mt. Everest from the base camp. D) A finance manger’s quandary over the best way of raising money from the market. 3)According to the passage, which of the following options about the application of a game theory to a conflictof‐ interest situation is true? A) Assuming that the rank order of preferences for options is different for different players. B) Accepting that the interests of different players are often in conflict. C) Not assuming that the interests are in complete disagreement. D) All of the above Next Question: I am going to take test on nov 8 2015. I am 2015 batch Passout. Present I don't have my 10th,B.Tech originals are not with me.It is in custody of my college adminstration. only i have semester wise transcripts with me .So am I write exam or not?

Login
Register

Sponsored Links

Advertisements

Challenger of the Day

no image

Dimple

India

Punjab

Time: 00:01:33

Points

19

Maths Quotes

MATHEMATICS is the key of every problem.

vivek .R

my math textbook is my role model. no matter how many problems it has it never sucide's.

prabhpreet singh

Placed User Comments

M4Math helped me a lot.

Vipul Chavan 3 years ago

Thanks m4 maths for helping to get placed in several companies.
I must recommend this website for placement preparations.

yash mittal 4 years ago

2511K+Registerd user
1758K+Engineers
753K+MBA Asprirant
3K+Enginnering College
250+Company Exam
150K+Interview Questions

All rights are reserved to @m4maths.com